A detailed or investment-grade energy audit (IGA) should include realistic assumptions. When an IGA is performed properly, its results should be thorough, and provide a clear guide for implementing energy conservation measures and a strategy for using energy and reducing costs in a facility.
A previous post about audit deficiencies described some circumstances that can lead to low-quality IGAs. The post also detailed how these deficiencies can result in unrealistic savings analysis, duplicate work in the engineering design process, and potential problems in energy savings performance contract (ESPC) agreements.
Preliminary Checklist
The following list can serve as a checklist during a preliminary screening of a detailed or investment-grade energy audit. Does the audit:
-
Balance energy usage (and demand, in the case of large electricity users) across at least one full year of energy data, factored separately according to different fuels, and preferably, recorded at each meter? The preferred means of presenting this sort of data are in graphs (e.g., pie charts) or tables.
While an IGA is supposed to provide a clear picture of a facility’s total energy supply and consumption, too often it lacks several key components that prevent it from fully improving overall energy utilization and cost reduction. Using the above checklist to verify that an IGA covers these essential details will help ensure a more accurate energy savings analysis.
For questions regarding IGAs and/or energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs), please comment to this post or submit a request through the Technical Assistance Center.
Content for this Blog post courtesy of Sentech-SRA/ICF International